Voting Member Profile

NoMan

Views: 3056

NoMan

Age: 25

Hometown: Baton Rouge, LA

Sign: Taurus

Last Logged In: about 1 hour ago

My Videos

1181595

NoMan's, "Why ...

Uploaded by NoMan

Views: 190

about 1 month ago

1181906

For Mystery

Uploaded by NoMan

Views: 135

about 1 month ago

1187781

My stories about women

Uploaded by NoMan

Views: 252

about 1 month ago

1274223

Viewer Questions:

Uploaded by NoMan

Views: 40

15 days ago

1274228

Part 2: Oh yeah

Uploaded by NoMan

Views: 36

15 days ago


1293814

60 second story

Uploaded by NoMan

Views: 46

6 days ago

News (More)

Posted on May 9, 2008 10:00 PM

Why Snickers is the man for this show:

This e-mail exchange alone should show you why Snickers is the man for this show. His response is funnier than mine, and I'm pretty damn hilarious. An edit for the offer of Mike's friend paying for the trip, it's not set in stone and I'd probably pay Mike out of pocket anyway, but it's a really nice gesture that the guy would let me hang out with him on a tropical island and learn his techniques. (And it wasn't so he could brag either, he didn't know about this e-mail or that I would post it up here).

Me to Snickers:

Mike is offering me the chance to do a seduction workshop with him. His friend is paying for it. It's three days in the Dominican Republic, 1000 dollars paid for the room. That's pretty nice of him, considering I can't really offer him anything in return for it. (Unless he needs a bodyguard?) So yeah, Mike pretty much wins in my book. KF113 and Oscarb are now both claiming that it was the website rules that they were protesting, but okay. If that's what they are protesting, why are they suddenly back when they find out they're going to be the potential winners?

By the way, I made a name for you. The Triple Ss of seduction, Snickers, Sensual, and Speed. I'm pissed about the thing though, I think they should have done what they said they were gonna do. Reset ALL the votes, and pick the winners from the top 20. Screw the Los Angeles casting, they're all wannabe actors. I think they managed to ham this one up pretty bad as far as that site goes, almost all of the voters and contestants seem pissed. I'm wondering if they're about to do a round five or a flaming ring of death.

SNICKER'S REPLY E-MAIL TO NOMAN:

----- Original Message ----
From: Bernard H.
To: Michael S.
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 10:55:24 PM
Subject: Re: Did you see the new rules?

Okay. I never really had anything against Mike. He played by the rules. He just had more leverage than the rest of us. And I thought there were a lot more contestants that needed Mystery's help more than he did. But the other two candidates did practically nothing. And it does seem to me like they're trying awfully hard now to play catch up. You're right. It is fishy that all of a sudden now they're in the game. The video requirement rules have been posted since day one. In my mind, there's no excuse for them not meeting the minimal requirements. It is good to know that Mike is reaching out to help someone who was in this game. You gotta do that workshop. Let me know how it goes man. The Dominican Republic! Que bella!

Triple S...Sounds like a Superhero. I like it! No cape or tights though. I don't want to send out the wrong message.Hah! I do feel you though. They should have reset the votes. We all got a crap deal on that one. The contestants on the site have a right to be upset. Hey, did you get the latest Vh1 email? Since they had to extend the voting into next week, this caused an unforseeable problem with the voting mechanism. It automatically resets after Mother's Day. This normally wouldn't be a problem if the voting had concluded as initually scheduled. So, they came up with a new rule. On Monday (May 12th), all the voters become finalists and the three finalists become the voters. It will actually fall in the hands of the three previous finalists to pick the winner of this competition. The producers are asking that everyone submit one final video so that we can wrap this up before the Democratic National Convention. I really don't think we're going to make it though. I overheard Mike saying that "this is bullsh*t" and he had his own website that he needed to run. So he was going back to it. KF113 said, "they're changing the rules again...I'm out!" And Oscarb said, "Sooo...explain to me what this website's all about again. This is my first time on here."

Posted on May 9, 2008 4:26 PM

An apology of sorts and some venting

I heard from KF113 that the reason he stopped campaigning and did not fulfill the requirements is because they kept changing the requirements and it was a matter of principle. My bad man. If I had known that prior, it would have been much respect to you.

Note that none of the top three guys have fulfilled all the requirements. But then again, the website didn't update to reflect requirements. Where were the cuts that we were supposed to see? The initial recount? The disqualifications?

I can't really hate that much when the rules changed constantly and the requirements, timelines, etc. changed, and the stuff that was supposed to change like the "What makes us special" profile requirement weren't implemented.

As always, I just hope the studio looks over my profile and the profiles of people I chose to be in my mansion, and that I put in my thumbs up list, and really considered who would be the best for television. That's my say.

Others I Like

Lab Rat

HighKey

HighKey

Rochester, NY

Schlub in the Club

eddieJERKY

eddieJERKY

Tracy, CA

Testimonials

Posted May 11, 2008 6:07 PM

oscarb

By oscarb

That was a reminder post, I was on their main show All Games Interactive. Unlike you guys I don't need comments to validate me.

Tiny-flag flag for review

Posted May 11, 2008 5:14 PM

Snickers

By Snickers

I saw the comment you left on facebook. Which email were you talking about though? Send it to me again. I'll check it out.

Tiny-flag flag for review

Posted May 11, 2008 4:58 PM

Snickers

By Snickers

I know! That cracks me up too. It's like it's his brand new to this site. There's no way I'm giving him a vote.

Tiny-flag flag for review

Read More

Write a Testimonial

You must be a member to post a comment. Please sign in.